Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic County Institute of Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 11:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Atlantic County Institute of Technology

Atlantic County Institute of Technology (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:N criteria for notability. Tatonka79 01:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

• KEEP Wikipedia should be inclusive not exclusive. The larger Wikipedia is the best of a resource it is. One million articles is much better that one hundred thousand articles. It should be a source of information on the most trivial matters to the most important.Callelinea 03:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:N criteria. --Charlene 05:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • It is considered helpful to explain why an article violates a given policy. This goes for the nom too. Morgan Wick 07:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: 1.7 million google hits (or 1580 when putting the school's name in quotes) suggest that there might be a case to be made for notability. Google news archives also have some hits. The article in its present form fails to claim notability, but it's likely that could be remedied. -Pete 05:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. This school has received secondary press coverage, this in the past month for example. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep This is the lone school of a regional school district. As a school district, we have consensus that such articles are notable. As noted, additional coverage does exists and should be added to the article to further demonstrate notability. Alansohn 06:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep given that it didn't take very much Google searching to realize that this isn't some arbitrary one in a million kind of school. The nom is understandable, however, given the lack of sources to establish notability. MartinDK 08:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Butseriouslyfolks 08:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N, as the article fails to even assert notability, and WP:V, as none of the asserted facts are cited to reliable sources. --Butseriouslyfolks 08:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Butseriously: the standard is not whether the article currently has reliable sources cited, but whether such sources exist. Take a look at [1], [2],
• Keep since all high schools are notable. Noroton 00:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Noroton. -- DS1953 ^talk 05:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.