Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aten Technology, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, I NPOV'd it a little more. Rx StrangeLove 04:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aten Technology, Inc.

Part of me tends towards wikify, but my main instinct is delete. To be honest, this whole page reads like a giant commercial. I don't really think that it belongs here, especially considering that the editor's sole contributions to Wikipedia have been to big up Aten. Maybe that's because of my line of thought that making KVM switches, as important as that may be, isn't exactly something that I would call contributing to public consciousness.iinag 22:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Please help me understand then the difference between the way this article reads and the way the Belkin article reads?--Aten 00:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Although the article is a bit better due to your modifications, the language used in it does have a few fundamental difference to the Belkin article still. First of all, all of the facts in the Belkin article have points of verification. Secondly, the Belkin article gives the reader a far more balanced view, whereas the Aten article is written very commercially, as though you wanted to hawk these products. If you could change that, and verify your facts, then I guess that I would drop my objections to the piece. iinag, 11:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep but wikify and reduce POV. This company does have 2,330,000 hits on Google and if it is the largest producer of those switch thingies it is quite notable. Dan 15:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Made some edits to the article in order to wikify and reduce POV. Please advise on any further edits. Thanks--Aten 20:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.