Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At-One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by User:Chrislk02 per CSD G11, blatant advertising. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 14:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] At-One

At-One (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Speedy tag was removed.Unsourced and no assertion of notability. Reads like Spam. NAHID 08:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

• Do not delete The article has been written by a business manager of AT-One who is responsible for all the copyrights. AT-One as well as the two mother organisations DLR and NLR are government owned companies without economic interests.
• Delete per Nom - also reads as WP:COPYVIO at moment as all text being added seems to be lifted from their website [1] -Hunting dog (talk) 09:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Spam and/or Copyvio (take your pick) Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Hard delete as pure unsourced advertising. Why bother keeping this copyright infringement? Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete The article is unsourced and there is no assertion of notability. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, a nice G11. FusionMix 14:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.