Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astronica

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:54, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Astronica

This article was tagged as {{Unencyclopedic}} and {{POV check}} on April 7 and has not been modified since. At first glance, this seems like some sort of non-notable psuedo-science or astrology. In fact, the last sentence of it reads, "Astronica is not related to Astrology." Zzyzx11 | Talk 16:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• See [http//www.astronica.org]. Meandering junk about some type of astrology-type stuff. If Astronica becomes a serious cult, it can have an article here. Else delete it. Anthony Appleyard 18:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, some kind of original research or simply not notable. -- Curps 19:30, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. Quale 05:18, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.