Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrid Menks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 23:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Astrid Menks

"Cohabiting companion" of one Warren Buffett. Absolutely zero claim of notability made anywhere aside from relationship to the notorious entrepreneur/philanthropist. Delete if not speedy A7. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete: relationship to a notable does not make one notable. - Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 14:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per CheNuevara's comment.--Victoriagirl 17:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. Scorpiondollprincess 19:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep After her picture and name appeared on the Yahoo newsphoto page two days ago, I wanted to know who she was, and how her bond to Buffett was known to people. Wikipedia answered without gossip or noise. As his charity may cause his fortune mean a great deal to people outside his family, it's worthwhile to know how his closest relationships work. --Crid 06:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep She is part of the description of Warren Buffett. rmellin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.194.213 (talk • contribs)
    • Anon user discounted. Punkmorten 23:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete no assertion of notability. There are plenty of precedents that being married to someone notable does not render a person notable themselves. I'd tag it for speedy (A7 db-bio) if there hadn't been any keep "votes". Paddles TC 14:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. She is not notable in her own right, and is already mentioned in the article on Warren Buffet. If she does something useful notable in the way Melinda Gates has, the article can be re-created. --Wine Guy Talk 22:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.