Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astraxaphysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and Berjowden. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 16:32, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Astraxaphysis

This article appears to be a joke. None of the information can be verified. Mongrel 8 16:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• BJAODN Crazy but gave me a giggle. ES2 18:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Savor the juicy deletes. AKADriver 19:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

  Just adding a comment - gsearch for "Astraxaphysis" results in ZERO non-wikipedia/wikimirror hits. "Lame duck" metaphor is verifiably derived from the 18th c. London Stock Exchange alongside its furry friends Bull and Bear. — AKADriver ☎ 01:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I have heard the Edison part of the story being told before. But I cannot find any references. rxnd ( t | € | c ) 21:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• BJAODN is exactly where this belongs. Stifle (talk) 00:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I came here to do some research. Last year, I got an e-mail from the Lame Duck Preservation or Rescue Society confirming this as a genuine condition, I'll look for it and post it here if I still have it.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.