Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astound Broadband

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 03:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Astound Broadband

Astound Broadband (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fails WP:SPAM, and reads like an advertisement. It has the company name plus their website link, which =spam. Diez2 16:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I added two references, so the article now passes WP:CORP. There is no evidence that the creator's is a single-purpose account. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Joeblack982 for the creator's other contributions.

I don't regard the inclusion of the company's website as evidence of spamming. It is generally helpful to the reader if an article about a company includes relevant external links, including the company's web site. And the article seems to be npov rather than promotional. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Passes WP:CORP per references added. --Oakshade 04:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.