Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for Financial Professionals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Association for Financial Professionals
I can't see how this passes WP:CORP also it is a bit WP:ADS Note the user who created it is User:afponline DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 02:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 02:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:VSCA. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Artw 14:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 16:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This is not a corp, so WP:CORP is the wrong standard to judge by. I think the specific standard should be WP:ORG, even though that is only proposed. There are a lot of career specific networking and continuing education associations. Finance has a bunch of them because CPAs and some other finance professionals are required to meet ongoing continuing education requirements. This association is international (U.S. and Canada at least), but I haven't found independent reliable sources to make much of an article yet. Organizations like this frequently do and publish surveys on compensation for their field and other topics specific to the field. This one does that, and also publishes a journal, but I'm not sure if they merit keeping as an author - the journal is free to members and we have no data on non-member subscriptions. (Disclosure, I work in Finance, but have no relationship with this specific organziation.)GRBerry 02:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Article as it stands comes across as an advertisement, and doesn't verify it's contents per WP:VERIFY. —TheJC (Talk • Contribs • Count) 00:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.