Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assemblage point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assemblage_point

Delete This has the appearance of an advertisment. The names seem too close to be coincidental, and the site link and book link seem likely to be closely related to the author's benefit. The coloured light stuff is quackery, but that of itself is not suggested to be the reason for deletion. Midgley 02:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nonverifiable, probably hoax or new quackery. mikka (t) 03:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to some kind of shamanistic magic/general page. --Krashlandon (e) 21:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not encyclopedic. Some googling shows this term meaning different things, so it would be best defined within the particular teaching (e.g. Castañeda/Don Juan). This article also looks like an ad for a particular new age teacher. Fan1967 22:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment the particular new age teacher has a close resemblance in name and geogrpahical location to User:Whaleto whose whale.to site overlaps in content. I might have been too vague to start with. Midgley 23:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As above, also I note there's been no noteworthy editing since the day after it was submitted, and it's only been edited by the submitter, not counting copyedits/formatting and the AfD. Michael Ralston 06:18, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.