Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ass Traffic

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ass Traffic

Nothing in article to establish notabiliy. Looks like advertisement. -Rholton 20:54, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

• So totally delete. Spam. Removing the external link to prevent Wikipedia abuse. -- 8^D ^gab 21:09, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC)
• Well, my slogan is, What stupid spamvertisement will we Delete next? android↔talk 22:27, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
• This does not appear to be advertising. The site Alexa ranking is an impressive 1100. Using the Ovt inventory tool ( [1]) to query "asstraffic.com" yields 18000 searches compared to "wikipedia.org"'s 7000 (search data corresponds to number of times website address is searched for in most online search engines with the exception of Google) I don't like the idea of Wikipedia over run by commercial entries but I would just like to inform others that this is popular website. Lotsofissues 23:12, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Half of the Web is porn. I'm not sure 1100 for a porn site is really all that notable. I am, however, willing to do some research... android↔talk 23:57, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
    • By this measure, it does make it one of the web's largest porn sites. Lotsofissues 02:09, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Even given that, I'm not sure how one could write an encyclopedic article about a run-of-the-mill pay porn site, no matter how many hits it gets. android↔talk 02:14, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
        • I don't mind if this entry is tossed but I can't quite understand why votes below me insist on calling it spam. I guess no one reads comments. Lotsofissues 22:58, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
          • Depressingly, I think you are right in most cases. So much for debate and consensus-building :( Kappa 00:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable CDC (talk) 23:36, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but we might regret it when Ass Traffic makes it big. Kyle543 00:08, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: advert. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, advert. Megan1967 05:55, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete wikispam --nixie 04:25, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Perhaps it's me, but when I visualise the phrase "ass traffic", I think of long hours spent straining on the toilet, cursing God for making my bowels the way they are.-Ashley Pomeroy 15:54, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • And now I will too. Thank you so much. Oh, and delete this unless someone demonstrates that it can be encyclopedically expanded. FreplySpang (talk) 05:45, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Don't delete this. This could be an article about a notorius pornsite. Also, I would much rather have pron sites deleted from the Internet than have this article deleted from Wikipedia; reason being is because Porn sites can have a whopping rating in notoriety. To read about guidelines about advertisemental microstubs, go to Wikipedia:Advertisement. --SuperDude 05:41, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: SuperDude, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, and you're not alone in thinking this page might become encyclopedic. However, it seems a bit disingenuous to refer to a proposed policy that you created a few days ago as though it supported your vote. -Rholton 14:56, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising, nothing of value. --Marianocecowski 10:35, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.