Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspidochelone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (closed by non-admin) per consensus and Smerdis of Tlön's rewrite and sourcing. RMHED (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Aspidochelone

Aspidochelone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No references and nothing found to clarify description and establish notability. Everything on Google seems to be in Chinese(?) language. Hammer1980·talk 20:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete Stream of consciousness article, zero sources, unwikied. Wheres the sources. Can't find anything on the web. scope_creep (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I have entirely rewritten the page, adding references. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Smerdis/Ihcoyc's rewrite makes it suitable for WP. Deor (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Rewrite solves problem. If it was like this originally I would not have considered nominating. Hammer1980·talk 00:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. After Ihcoyc's rewrite, this is a well-sourced and informative article. EALacey (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Looks fine, now. Tim Ross (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • comment hmmm, funny that my google is set to search by default on English, Chinese and Japanese languages, and most of the results are English with a little Japanese pages(FF XI monster). I tried a specific Chinese laguage search, and the first result gave a description of it being a monster originated from Europe. Also, listing a new article AfD in just 3 days is hardly assuming good faith. List it as a stub next time and save others time, please.
  • Keep Given the status as of now, it seems to be pretty good start article. MythSearchertalk 18:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.