Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian supremacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Asian supremacy

Got the {{unreferenced}} tag weeks ago, but no reliable source were given. Note that the linked article from the Time Magazine doesn't use the term "Asian supremacy". A careful web search turns up Wikipedia and mirrors, some forum postings and places where the words are used in another meaning (most often supremacy within Asia, like "India's South Asian supremacy remains intact.")

Delete as original research and neologism.

Pjacobi 09:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete. per nom. Tychocat 10:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Song lyrics and an article that doesn't mention the subject are not reliable sources, so this fails WP:V by a long shot. Kevin 10:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not even close to verifiable based on what's there. --Coredesat 10:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No reliable source, self-researched material. --Counterrestrial 12:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, original research, the article does too much analysis and tries too hard to prove the phenomena exists without sources. hateless 17:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 20:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 20:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - content applies to any form of racial supremacy, no interesting examples or sources, the "see also" links cover the same info multiple times. Whole group of articles should probably be merged into one. - Wickning1 18:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Naconkantari 04:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Although this article needs quite a bit of cleaning up and definitely needs better sources, the concept it is focusing on and is definitely notable. There is all kinds of worthwhile content that could be incorporated here, e.g. the role of Japanese belief in their racial superiority in leading to WW2, etc. Let's give this a chance to becoem a worthwhile article. Quepasahombre 14:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm not optimistic about it being updated well and staying that way. As the author wrote it, it reads like a piece of racism. "Hey them damn asians think they're better than us!" Borderline WP:NPOV. Further updates are likely to go down that alley as well. - Wickning1 14:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Original research, references are questionable to say the least and is hardly verifiable.--Auger Martel 10:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Ideology is verifiable. The organization Goldsea supports Asian supremacy.--Dark Tichondrias

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.