Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian pride

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus for now, needs to be sourced and rewritten. Nominator should wait for a while and renominate it again, if good sources are not available. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 14:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Asian pride

Asian pride (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Though a recognizable term, the contents of this article are all original research. The concerns were raised approximately three monthes ago via the talk page and the appropriate notices were added. No significant revisions have been made since then. I have tried looking for reliable sources to no avail. Luke! 18:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete - only two sources are cited, and on cursory inspection I can't tell if they pass WP:RS. Although the term may be in widespread use, the current article looks like mostly OR. Delete unless rewritten and sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton Vivat Regina! 19:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • weak delete unless an argument can be made that the current contents would be useful to preserve. I don't think those Angelfire citations are going to cut it. But there might be enough legitimate sources for an article here: [1] --W.marsh 22:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Rewriting. –Pomte 23:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep it is probably sourcable.DGG 05:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • week keep appears to be some sources--Sefringle 22:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Suffers from all the problems mentioned on the talk page, especially original research. It looks like someone has written an essay here, and posted it as a mainspace encyclopedia article. zadignose 13:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.