Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashurst, East Sussex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ashurst, East Sussex

Ashurst, East Sussex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This page is about Ashurst, West Sussex, for which a page exists. Charles 21:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Page contains duplicate information to an existing article, and is not a valid redirect candidate (i.e. no Ashurst, East Sussex exists). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Appears to be a duplicate of an existing article that has been given the wrong name, making it an invalid redirect candidate. --Malleus Fatuorum 21:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. The existing page as noted already, exists, and to redirect it would be geographically incorrect. Had it just said "Sussex", it may have been a valid redirect candidate, but this should simply just be deleted. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete what is probably an unintentional mistake on the originator's part. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 00:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete as error.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as G6, housekeeping. —Caesura^(t) 06:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Seems like a simple mistake of a page. Lawrence Cohen 23:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.