Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Fernee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. east.718 at 15:37, 11/5/2007

[edit] Ashley Fernee

Ashley Fernee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No sign of notability. FayssalF - Wiki me up® 21:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete the person is not notable. Chris! ct 22:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no evidence of notability. JJL 00:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep Playing professional level in a sport is inherently notable. Edward321 00:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep While I agree professional sports people are inherantly notable, the article really REALLY needs some expansion. Jcuk 01:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
    • I don't believe that would be possible --> Adelaide: 1996-98, 2 games, 0 goals. His carrer stopped after 2 games w/ 0 goals. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 11:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Where are there reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability? Where is the content, analysis or even sporting stats? I think Edward321 has a "woeful lack of knowledge" when it comes the notability criteria for sports bios. --Gavin Collins 19:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment Woeful lack of knowledge? I'm directly using the notability criteria you linked. The very first thing said under Athletes is 'Competitors who have played in a fully professional league', which this person has. The other things you list - secondary sources, etc. are things that make an article better, but that is a seperate issue from notability. If notability meant what you think it does then every stub should be deleted as non-notable. Edward321 04:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - meets WP:BIO for athletes having played at the top level of his sport. -- Whpq 19:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. - Ukulele 21:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep played professional sports at top level, so merits an article. Some further info and refs would be useful though. -- MightyWarrior 21:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete Just passes WP:BIO but fails, I think, WP:NOTE. WP:BIO does say "However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception." Common sense should rule here, I think. --Malcolmxl5 21:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Satisfies the requirements for WP:BIO. References should be included to denote his (admittedly brief) career stats, but this is a separate cleanup issue distinct from notability requirements. --Craw-daddy | T | 11:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Oops, I noticed someone has added a reference to his career stats since I last looked at the page last night. --Craw-daddy | T | 11:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep meets WP:BIO for athletes having played at the top level of his sport. - --Brewcrewer 17:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.