Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashlea Evans (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ashlea Evans
The only information in this article is about the subject's time on Big Brother, and this information would be better on the relevant season's article. jd || talk || 09:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete about 30000 Ghits may not be notable yet--Jusjih 09:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Non-notable outside of BB; and the BB content is just fancruft. He was a part of BB -- that's the article that should accommodate her. Fails WP:BIO -- the references are more about BB than her (and are superficial at that). The JPStalk to me 09:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - reality TV cruft, not notable outside TV show. MER-C 09:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - This article was already up for deletion and the result was Keep. Here's the link to the previous debate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashlea_Evans A-Supreme 14:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:BIO, like most US BB contestants, based on non-trivial coverage from multiple sources. The fact this was nominated a second time, without any new reason given, and not bothering to mention/address the prior nomination, is something I find concerning. People shouldn't re-AFD things till they get the desired result (it was only mentioned by somebody else). Since no reason for a new AFD was given, I'll assume no good one exists. We aught not vote on AFDs based on how much we like/dislike a particular genre of entertainment. --Rob 05:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. 2nd AfD: Without proper notification as such, should disqualify it to be considered. Never a good idea unless a really long time between both nominations. I assume there will be few sources about Bush that do not mention him mainly for his presidency. So, George W Bush Afd? — SomeHuman 4 Oct 2006 00:37 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.