Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashes fall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ashes fall

Ashes fall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Ashes Fall are no strangers to on stage injuries or blood and sweat . . . But they are strangers to meeting the requirements of WP:N and WP:BAND. The article was tagged for notability earlier in the month and no notability information was added. They have a single EP and the article is full of POV phrases ("the band members "flail around" etc janejellyroll 00:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, no indication why this passes WP:BAND. Seraphimblade 00:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, page is just a cut and paste of their website. They could be a noteable in the future, but not at the moment. Neonblak 00:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment You would be correct on that, good catch. I've removed the two paragraphs that were copyvios accordingly. Seraphimblade 01:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not, as yet, satisfy WP:MUSIC--Anthony.bradbury 01:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - does not pass WP:BAND. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 01:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BAND. Arjun 02:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't meet with WP:BAND, it's not neutral, and it's not verifiable to me. --Tohru Honda13^{Talk•Sign here} 04:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per failing WP:BAND. Static Universe 07:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Hate to jump on the WP:BAND wagon, but the group seems non-notable at this time.
• Delete a single EP and a POV article is not enough to pass WP:MUSIC.-- danntm ^T _C 17:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: One of their ex-drummers is now a member of Mortal Treason, who certainly appear to be notable. WP:MUSIC states- Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such. as criteria for notability. J Milburn 18:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:MUSIC does not say that any band that ever featured anyone who went on to play in a notable is thereby notable, it says that this may be an indication that sufficient sources will exist. Aside from the fact that Mortal Treason barely passes WP:MUSIC, I could not find a single reliable independent source for this band anywhere on the internets, and that means policy says no article whatever guidelines might think. The primary notability criterion is multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable independent sources. I was not able to find any provably independent coverage for this band, trivial or not. Guy (Help!) 19:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Guy. And that sentence that the nom listed sounds like something you would find on a fansite or theirs, or a newspaper article. --TeckWiz^Talk Contribs_@ 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.