Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asha Gawli
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 16:15, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Asha Gawli
Being the wife of a politian does not make herself notable and it had been a stub since Jan so I think it wont expand either Delete --Aranda56 00:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I expanded it. My sources are listed on the article's talk page. Chick Bowen 01:02, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Being the wife of a provincial legislator wouldn't be important enough for a WP article, but I Googled and found this link which indicates coverage of her being arrested on a murder charge. Someone more knowledgeable than I should let us know verifiably whether this got major-media coverage there. (It could just be a smear that a political foe once planted on some little news website, for all I know.) I see Chick B added a sentence but no link on this point to the stub, while I was researching this too. Help please. Barno 01:09, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- She wasn't actually arrested--a complaint was registered. Your link above, Barno, was one of my sources; the other is listed on the article's talk page. There are other similar items. The only thing I figured out from my googling was that her husband is a former gangster and she's been suspected—but never convicted—of being involved. That doesn't make her all that notable, but notable enough for a stub, I think. If she gets busted for something real we can expand the stub. Chick Bowen 01:41, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, CB. Based on that, I'm not sure about her facts' importance/verifiability being enough to merit a real bio article, and we're encouraged to make stubs into either real articles or merged sections of a parent article. But I'm on the fence whether this can or should be expanded, so no vote. Barno 01:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Well, just for the hell of it I looked her up on Lexis/Nexis. She hasn't been in trouble since 2004, but I added some more info and some sources I found there (can't link because it's a subscription service). Chick Bowen 01:59, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, CB. Based on that, I'm not sure about her facts' importance/verifiability being enough to merit a real bio article, and we're encouraged to make stubs into either real articles or merged sections of a parent article. But I'm on the fence whether this can or should be expanded, so no vote. Barno 01:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- She wasn't actually arrested--a complaint was registered. Your link above, Barno, was one of my sources; the other is listed on the article's talk page. There are other similar items. The only thing I figured out from my googling was that her husband is a former gangster and she's been suspected—but never convicted—of being involved. That doesn't make her all that notable, but notable enough for a stub, I think. If she gets busted for something real we can expand the stub. Chick Bowen 01:41, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep In my view, this is capable of being extended. There are verifiable records of her arrest last year see [1]. Capitalistroadster 01:57, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep :
- Being the wife of a politian does not make herself notable but she is a leader herself. It's all written on the page.
- it had been a stub since Jan so I think it wont expand either: Is the strangest piece of reasoning I have heard. We may have to delete a substantial chunk of wikipedia if all stubs which are unchanged from January 2005 are removed.
- Just because a page has not changed since January 2005 does not mean it will not expand in the future. Manik Raina 05:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Arun Gawli. – AxSkov (☏) 05:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I have no problem with this article. Alf melmac 09:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It seems many articles on notable figures remain in stub holding patterns until arriving at AfD. Hall Monitor 18:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - establishes notability. Guettarda 17:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable enough for me. Shauri 19:49, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. ··gracefool |☺ 18:25, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
