Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asdonk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Asdonk

Has nothing to do with equine species. Doesn't seem notable or verifiable. 1 google hit for "Asdonk Estate", nothing for +Asdonk +"Earl of Leuven", nothing for +Asdonk +"Charles the Great"... and +Asdonk +Merovingian seems to give lists of names. Delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 09:20, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Delete. Feels fabricated, but if it can be verified and wikified could be good... but google doesn't give much cause for optimism. rodii 21:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

I take back that "fabricated." See the Verasdonck site. A google search for Asdonck turns up more. Still low quality, unwikified, needs work. rodii

• Delete. Although User:Rodii has found a source that seems to support part of the article, I still suspect that someone has tried to create a very long pedigree by pulling together scraps of information about people in different ages that may not be connected. I would want to see much better sources before voting to let this stay. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 00:30, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: That does sound like a description bordering on original research. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 06:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.