Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arunan Sridharan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 22:26, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arunan Sridharan

Delete unverifiable vanity. "Arunan Sridharan" + "Canada" = 7 unique Google hits,[1] none of which can be confirmed to be this individual or verify the claims. One would expect more of a web presence for "a leader in the internet solutions industry at the age of 17." Postdlf 00:07, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete Vanity. -- BMIComp (talk) 00:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nnanity. -Splash 00:59, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. nn and vanity --Eliezer 03:35, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. --Malathion 06:20, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. utcursch | talk 09:54, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Abstain I abstain. Shorthair 15:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete --Bhadani 18:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity. Lots of hits come up for someone who apparently works on databases. But his website (www.noXmedia.net) redirects to a site that sells handbags?? --Etacar11 22:18, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Found voxell.com associated Arunan Sridharan in a local newspaper. I believe it is the same person as a small biography is attached to the news article -- I am in the process of finding this article online. // With further research it seems this person headed or developed a software which is widely associated with noxmedia.net. This was found at the following website vbulletin.org--runix
    • Comment I started a trend. Shorthair 02:29, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
      • Comment Aslong as abstain still means "against" then I don't mind following a trend. Runix
        • Uh, I very much doubt that abstain means keep. I would suggest that abstentions will, being abstentions, not be counted when it comes to closing the vote. If you want the article kept, you should vote that way. -Splash 13:59, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 04:01, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, I'm sure he developed some software but who really cares. Dcarrano 22:39, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, NN/Vanity. --Ragib 17:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.