Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arturo Ithurralde

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel Bryant 12:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arturo Ithurralde

Arturo Ithurralde (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lacks Notability. There are several occasions on Google where he is listed but only as one of a group of referees attached to games reports. JBEvans 19:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

*Procedural Keep Nominator has not provided any arguments for deletion ChrisTheDude 07:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - No reason for deletion given, no AfD notice on page. Qwghlm 08:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I'm the nominator and I have added the afd template to the page. Not sure exactly how to include the reason in the initial process. My bad, I'll research it. However, the article seems to lack notability and that is my reason for suggesting deletion. JBEvans 12:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
    • I think I cleaned up the initial report. Sorry for the confusion. JBEvans 12:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep As football referees go, it doesn't get more notable than being selected to ref in the World Cup Finals..... ChrisTheDude 13:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep As above, if he refereed in a World Cup Final, that is surely notable. Tangerines 20:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, refereed in the world cup. So obvious keep. Englishrose 14:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, refereeing one game in a World Cup final stage is notable enough for inclusion. – Elisson • T • C • 20:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.