Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Luigi30 (Ταλκ) 01:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Artix Entertainment

Vanity article about N-N company (or just self-styling of individual developer) that has produced a handful of flash games. No independent web presence. Randwicked 02:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment - I would dearly love to vote keep on this one, just for encouragement value. These guys are working really hard to produce what will be some really cool games. I haven't played theirs, but I have played others produced by other people out there. This stuff is hard to find. A flash RPG? I actually have bookmarked a site called Game Garage that is full of wonderful little flash games. Beautiful stuff. All free. And I kick back and play the games every so often and its a wonderful way to spend an hour or two. These guys are great. Whilst they don't strictly meet the criteria for being kept on wikipedia, and hence I can't vote keep, it is a pity. I hope that if the guys read this that they don't get disheartened and keep up the good work. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 04:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - sorry, I just followed the link to AdventureQuest. My bad. They do meet the guidelines to being kept. And it says right there in the article that Artix Entertainment wrote the game. If one is notable, then so is the other. Simple. Sorry. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 04:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per Zordrac. What is that link to Leeroy Jenkins doing in the See also section of AdventureQuest? Wasn't he from World of Warcraft? - Mgm|(talk) 17:06, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.