Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artichoke Crepe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per Creme brulee Nothing recipe-related to transwiki. SkierRMH (talk) 07:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Artichoke Crepe

Artichoke Crepe (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No indication as to the notability of this dish. It's just a dish, we don't have articles on every ... food dish... in the world (I hesitate to use the term "recipe" because it isn't even a recipe). Corvus cornixtalk 00:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sounds delicious, but the nom's right, and there's nothing notable about a particular variant on crepes. Recollections about an AFD for tacos al pastor some time ago. Perhaps move over to wikibooks? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to WikiBooks: YUK... This isn't notable and this article, as it stands, isn't appropriate for this Wiki. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:Notable, quite honestly if this gets to stay on I have a list of about 50 dishes I have featured on my menus over the years and I want an article for myself as well. (J/k, just meant to illustrate a point) This and another article (Sweet and Sour Calamari) were obviously written for self promotion, but the dishes outside of their own restaurants have no notability whatsoever.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 05:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. I can find blogs and some other sources which may or may not be reliable - this article may or may not be original research. Sources should have been cited better.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 06:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I would have to go with the WP:Notable reason and say this is not. Also, every variation of a food item does not need its own article. - Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC))
  • Delete as NN per nom et al. Seems to be a WP:COATRACK for Chris Albano. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 00:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.