Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Bird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Arthur Bird

Arthur Bird (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Badly sourced, nn Lumberjake (talk) 04:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete no indication that he was notable, and a good chunk of it reads like OR by a very old person! Creator name raises issue of possible COI. Travellingcari (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, one mention in Google Books (I think). Sounds like several stories in Into the Wild, actually, but not really notable. --Dhartung | Talk 06:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete mmm... Badly sourced and some badly style, diction. OAS ^{talk to me} —Preceding comment was added at 11:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:BIO - no real claim to notability here in fact. Wikipedia is not a family history website.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy A7. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.