Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsim, The Ars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The article as written is junk, but from personal knowledge I can tell you that the term is a real pejorative, quite widespread, and could easily merit an article. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arsim, The Ars

No evidence to show the reality or notability of the term. --Peta 00:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Arbusto 01:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable slang term, if not a fake. Opabinia regalis 01:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete according to the talk page it is a real term, but this article is wrongly titled and is unverifiable original research (and I'm not sure it isn't just an excuse to write "arses"). Yomangani^talk 02:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Hello32020 03:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 04:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, also possible attack page. JIP | Talk 11:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Yomangani. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 12:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN and WP:OR --Maelnuneb (Talk) 14:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Wish we could find an applicable speedy criterion. Cool3 15:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even if a real term, the article is commentary and lacking any sources. Agree that "arses" might be the reasoning for this. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 01:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Pedia-I 18:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.