Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrogantology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

delete - not even funny. DS 12:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arrogantology

Pretty obvious hoax eaolson 18:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete and possibly BJAODN per nom. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 18:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP is not for things made up in school one day. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · contribs · e@} 18:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT and WP:BALLS. If there were barnstars for Stupid Article of the Month, this would be a prize contender. RGTraynor 18:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Maybe someone should start Wikimadeupreligionspedia. NawlinWiki 20:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I still don't understand how you can be bored enough to make up a religion. I worry sometimes. Anyway, yes, this is absolutely a hoax. Srose (talk) 21:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NFT, WP:VAIN and possibly WP:HOAX or WP:NONSENSE. Allisonmontgomery69 23:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 01:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Do not BJAODN; it's not that funny. Everyone thinks they're inventing the next Flying Spaghetti Monster, but they're not that clever. Fan-1967 14:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:BALLS, WP:NFT. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.