Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArnoldExposed.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ArnoldExposed.com

nn website Willy Beback 19:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

What does "nn" mean, Willy? What specific issues do you have with the article? GeorgeC 19:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

"nn" means "non-neutral." -Amatulic 21:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

If it's referring to deletion, 'nn' means non-notable. A non-neutral topic may not warrant deletion if it's notable enough. Incidentally, this exchange may underscore why it's not great to use abbreviations for this sort of thing. ScottW 22:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Alexa ranking of 504,075, very little press coverage (unless someone can point this out to me). This doesn't seem to meet WP:WEB. Wildthing61476 19:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Smells strongly of POV-pushing. I couldn't find any press coverage. EVula 20:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, yet-another-Alex-Jones spinoff or something like that. --Dhartung | Talk 21:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete. POV but fixable. Fails to meet WP:WEB though. -Amatulic 21:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable. -Will Beback 23:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC) (Note - not the nominator)

• weak delete. if there was a significant movement to amend the constitution, this could end up getting more traffic, but that's crystal balling. Montco 01:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• How can there be POV problems when the focus of the website is against amending the Constitution to allow Schwarzenegger to run for president? MoveOn.org promotes a view and its article states it, but does not push it. Does anyone claim otherwise? So, why does the same consideration for that article not apply to this one? And Dhartung, I find your comments reek of selective outrage. If you don't like Alex Jones that's your business. However, seeking to delete articles about subjects you disagree with is wrong. GeorgeC 02:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• On second thought, just go ahead and delete the article. Sorry to have caused trouble. I know the rules for deletion say don't take it personally, but I can't help but take it personally because if it was a non-controversial website, we wouldn't be here discussing it. GeorgeC 07:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I've been known to nominate websites that don't meet WP:WEB. Content doesn't matter to me one bit. Wildthing61476 11:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I believe you. GeorgeC 03:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The TV show Tripping the Rift set in the future said that the USA changed their constitution so he could become president and I expect it to happen. Oh and a WP:WEB fail, too. Anomo 02:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Fine GeorgeC 03:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The site should be included as an ext link (not just a reference) in the Arnold Schwarzenegger article, but it doesn't need a separate article. JamesMLane t c 11:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.