Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armifulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 03:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Armifulation

Neologism. Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_for_things_made_up_in_school_one_day אריאל יהודה 02:24, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as unverifiable patent nonsense. Flyboy Will 03:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Admitted neologism: "Armifulation -is the act of sponstaneously inventing a new word...the word armifulation was armifulated itself by Michael Worthman" Endomion 04:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 04:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• I apologize. I am new, not only to wikipedia, but the internet as well. The term armifulation should not be considered entirely valid, although it is quite well know through several cities in Newfoundland and Labrador. Once the term can be properly cited in sevral reliable sources I hope it can be eligible for admission into the wiktionary. Right now, it's only documentation exists in the folklore archives at Memorial University of Newfoundland. I have also written an inqusitive letter to Funk and Wagnall's to see how a colloquialism can evolve into a universally accepted english word. Again, sorry for the misunderstanding. Sincerely, Mike Worthman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.251.146.204 (talk • contribs) 05:18, 26 December 2005
• Delete, as per nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• delete per nom, obvious --Quarl 09:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as self-admitted neologism with zero google hits. Being a neologism isn't sufficient to speedy, however, and the article doesn't fit within our narrow criteria for patent nonsense. —Cryptic (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • We need a new speedy-deletion category for this kind of obvious non-word --Quarl 19:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom —the preceding unsigned comment is by TheRingess (talk • contribs) 01:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, WINAD and WP:V. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 07:12, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.