Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlo Rose

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. (IP votes not counted) - Mailer Diablo 17:11, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arlo Rose

Seems to be a vanity page. Even if Arlo Rose didn't write this, I don't believe he is noteworthy enough to warrant an article here. Oliver Keenan 20:53, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for reasons above. Oliver Keenan 20:53, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete softwaredeveloper-cruft. Heard of Konfabulator due to last year's announcement of Mac OS X Tiger's feature Dashboard. [1] The person is just not notable, enough. --Anonymous Cow 20:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, though I've heard of Konfabulator, which could alternatively be "merged" with this article. --Asriel86 23:22, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable Dsmdgold 01:29, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I get an email or so a week asking why my link in the Eazel entry is a dead link, so I added one. Delete if you want, but then someone should edit the Edit the Eazel page (where someone felt I was notable). --69.238.246.117 22:00, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Another quick note... I asked some folks that were more familiar with the Wikipedia etiquette, and they suggest how to rewrite the entry to be more like Darin's or Andy's. I've now fixed it so that you all will find it more acceptable. --69.238.246.117 01:57, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Sorry, but still agree with the Delete votes above. If asked why your link is red, you might consider unlinking it. Radiant_* 09:31, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
• I guess I'm not clear on how Darin Adler, Bud Tribble, Dave Hyatt, or any of the other software developers I see on here are okay, but I'm not.--69.238.246.117 18:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and rework This man is probably significant enough to deserve a least a small biography. Nothing radical. The current article does suck, though. --huwr 14:14, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep He is a valid contributor to the Eazel project. More information is better than less.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.