Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Areems

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as an attack page. --malathion ^talk 21:08, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Areems

The article is new and needs to grow still; rapid deletion is probably not the way to go as it is a valid entry subject (although my admittedly limited writing skills may not have done said subject justice). I request aid from the wikipedia user base to help this article grow into the full-fledged entry it deserves to be. Theplebianking 20:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• I agree, Keep and improve, it has been started less than an hour ago. Pigger 20:08, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable troll. Also article appears to be an attack page related to some sort of GNAA infighting. I'm the one that nominated it for speedy deletion. Dave6 20:12, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• GNAA infighting? There is no such thing, mister. You can't resist, can you? Always tryin' to keep the black man down. Why don't you try to improve the article, instead of hatin'? Pigger 20:33, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Allow this article to be kept and make it flourish over time. It should not be deleted, in my opinion. anonymous 21:15, 10 August 2005 (GMT)

• Fag. God you're a self-righteous cunt aren't you mister 'dave six'. Chill out and let the areems article grow. Or are you jealous of his burgeoning fame? Theplebianking 20:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• STRONG Keep. In the face of the growing epidemic of obesity, it is in the best interest of our children that this article not only be kept but highly publicised. --Impi.za 20:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, please take your pathetic and boring injokes elsewhere. Ben-w 20:26, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. YA GUYS NO JOKING HERE SERIOS BUSINESS Ignatiov (talk · contribs) (this is his first edit)
• Delete any mention of the GNAA apart from its own page. No notability. Censure Theplebianking for making a ridiculously phrased nomination. JFW | T@lk 20:32, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• I agree. Also, Armands is obviously not a former GNAA member, as it is clearly visible on the photo that the colour of his skin is pasty white, and the most important requirement for GNAA membership is being a Gay Nigger. I'll fix it. Pigger 20:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC) p.s. I think Theplebianking is doing pretty damn well for a new user.

• Speedy delete as an attack page. DES ^(talk) 20:54, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• Look, I put a lot of effort into this page okay and all of the information is factually correct, totally accurate. If you think you detect a bias well that may be the case! After all, aren't we all biased a little bit? Regardless, you should try to elimanate the bias from the article instead of wantonly tossing about VFDs and quick VFDs; it is a valid entry on a relatively well-known troll. (I can only think of a few more widely-known: SovietRussia, timecop, _ns, klerck maybe?) Theplebianking 21:05, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.