The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2007-03-01 10:50Z
No context. This is the schema for some (unspecified) database, which we don't have. RJFJR 17:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. This would only be useful to programmers, who have other resources for this sort of thing. --Dhartung | Talk 17:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Tumbleweedtumbles 18:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.