Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Area 10 Project Space Peckham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Area 10 Project Space Peckham

Area 10 Project Space Peckham (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not established or sourced per WP:ORG. Article also has WP:COI issues.RJASE1 Talk 12:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Not notable; no external sources; unlikely to be of interest outside the local area. YechielMan 15:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep at present but it needs a cleanup as it currently reads like an advert. Eagle Wharf is a major project; this would probably be better as part of a single Eagle Wharf article. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- a quick Google search turned up just 26 hits, none of them appearing to meet the Reliable Source and Notability Guidelines' requirements. I'm willing to overlook conflict of interest issues and reconsider if notability is demonstrated. --A. B. (talk) 03:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Unless sourced. --RaiderAspect 05:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete :: 1) the subject itself lacks general notability; 2) the article as is, has been padded with peripheral text not strictly relevant to the supposed subject; 3) reads as advertising copy. -- 62.25.109.196 08:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No reliable sources, and the significance of this operation is impossible to determine without them. EdJohnston 17:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment to closing admin - Even if this gets deleted can I request it not be salted, as per the conversation on my talk page regarding a possible recreation of this in a valid form. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 10:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Salting is extremely rare, so I dont think there's much risk of that. --RaiderAspect 02:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although this AFD has been open for a full week, there have no edits to the article other than bots and COI until my own small edit a few minutes ago. — Athænara ✉ 06:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.