Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Architecture of Btrieve

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Call me funny, but I guess I'm not in the minority when I say that former Featured Articles are frequently considered to be worthy of further development - and the issues the nominator brings up can be fixed through other channels. Just-because nominations aren't generally very fruitful. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Architecture of Btrieve

Get rid of it. Seriously. You buggers removed it from FARC even though removing for lack of ref tags was never agreed in FARC, etc. So, delete it from the face of the earth. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Per nom. Daniel5127 | Talk 06:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - Just because it's not a featured article anymore does not mean that it isn't an article that's worth keeping. Where's my syringe of SSRI's? — CJewell (talk to me) 08:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • speedy keep per i'm not quite clear which criteria it does not satisfy? the_undertow talk 09:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • comment: I've asked TSBDY to explain somewhere - anywhere - why she's mass nominating her articles with unorthodox reasons. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-18 11:11Z
  • Speedy Keep Article doesn't fall under any category for deletion reasons. -- GJD 12:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep; no real reason for deletion has ever been given. Tizio 10:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.