This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 18:22, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
Apparent vanity and/or hoax. This purported expert in string theory draws only one Google hit, and was apparently working on his A-levels in physics back in 2000. Delete unless notability is independently confirmed. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 22:15, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Agree with Ten, delete unless notability is confirmed. Mr Bound 22:57, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. JamesBurns 23:17, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete apparent nn vanity, nothing comes up on physics journal search [1] --Etacar11 00:44, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.