Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arachnid (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 08:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Arachnid (band)
Article on extremely obscure band that only released a demo in 2005 and isn't listed on allmusic guide Mecanismo | Talk 01:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Very obscure band, written in the first person plural, no less. Chris the speller 02:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - NN band. Lose the picture, too. Alr 02:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jasmol 03:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- 'Delete page unless sources are provided. Wikipedia doesn't need notability requirements, but it does need verifiability, which this lacks. —Simetrical (talk) 04:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- To clarify: it is my opinion, as explained elsewhere, that Wikipedia does not need notability requirements, and in this instance my opinion is not contrary to policy. —Simetrical (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Notability is only one of the various aspects where the article fails to justify its existence. For example, analyze the article on the light of WP:MUSIC. It fails to satisfy every single guideline listed there. On the other hand, let's not forget that an entertainer's notoriety is directly proportional to it's importance --Mecanismo | Talk 12:08, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- Well, WP:MUSIC is a notability argument. —Simetrical (talk) 05:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Notability is only one of the various aspects where the article fails to justify its existence. For example, analyze the article on the light of WP:MUSIC. It fails to satisfy every single guideline listed there. On the other hand, let's not forget that an entertainer's notoriety is directly proportional to it's importance --Mecanismo | Talk 12:08, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- To clarify: it is my opinion, as explained elsewhere, that Wikipedia does not need notability requirements, and in this instance my opinion is not contrary to policy. —Simetrical (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. FCYTravis 04:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--SarekOfVulcan 09:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and lament again the lack of a speedy criterion for band vanity Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- delete as per above J\/\/estbrook 20:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete As per nomination, and wishing there was a Speedy Delete criteria for vanity pages of bands.
- Do Not Delete This bands page is as valid of an entry as any other band on Wikipedia, and deserve their place just as any other band. Just because it's not famous doesn't mean we should delete it. Psychomonkey 17:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
