Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Approaches to International Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep --Stephen 23:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Approaches to International Law
This is just a research essay, and it does not describe itself. It instead persuades people to use "approaches to international law", whatever this is. This article is very scholarly and it appears that only experienced in law would be able to understand this article/essay. It would need a very substantial rewrite to make this an actual article. The essay is also very confusing to read. contribsSTYROFOAMâ˜1994TALK 18:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep but improve sourcing and give it a good WP:LEAD to orient the lay reader. This looks like a useful article on critical approaches (or frameworks) to the study of international law, a valid topic of some importance. Could stand improvement, but does not lack sources and we do include material that is very advanced in law, in science, and all other areas. (We just try to make it as accessible as possible.) --Dhartung | Talk 09:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Article is valid and useful, although current content needs improving. The JPSwirlface (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Account created today. --Nlu (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please see my userpage if you wish to learn more. I have a lot of past experience as a vandal, but now wish to edit constructively. I chose this article at random from the afd category, and reviewed it as a constructive (and previously uninvolved) editor. If there is a consensus that everyone here is unhappy with this, I will of course retract my vote and desist until I am considered an established user. The JPSwirlface (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- The closing admin (who will not be me) is authorized to evaluate your vote as however he/she sees fit. --Nlu (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, obviously I'll accept that. I don't want to go making any enemies at this point. The JPSwirlface (talk) 17:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- The closing admin (who will not be me) is authorized to evaluate your vote as however he/she sees fit. --Nlu (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please see my userpage if you wish to learn more. I have a lot of past experience as a vandal, but now wish to edit constructively. I chose this article at random from the afd category, and reviewed it as a constructive (and previously uninvolved) editor. If there is a consensus that everyone here is unhappy with this, I will of course retract my vote and desist until I am considered an established user. The JPSwirlface (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Account created today. --Nlu (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- keep and improve. It is nice to have a single article as a starting point for a complex subject. Links, references and footnotes can be added as part of the normal improvement process. Hmains (talk) 04:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
