Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appledore IV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. kingboyk 16:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Appledore IV

another non-notable boat. This is getting funnier every time. Delete.  RasputinAXP  c 20:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I could see an article on BaySail, with this boat listed there, but it doesn't deserve its own article. Gwernol 21:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. --BillC 21:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment -- Tall ships are a sufficiently unusual sight in this day and age that there aren't that many of them. Abstaining. Haikupoet 01:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - Haikupoet is right, tall ships are unusual and some are definitely notable, but this is a 1989-built leisure boat used by a commercial operation. Compare with Tall Ships Youth Trust and Stavros S Niarchos (ship). Trivia fans: Stavros was completed and fittted out at Appledore yards (no connection). I'm undecided. It looks like spam for BaySail as-is (TSYT is a not-for-profit), but open to persuasion either way. Just zis Guy you know? 13:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - personally, she's no USS Constitution.  RasputinAXP  c 13:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• redirect to baysail M1ss1ontomars2k4 14:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, it's a boat owned by a non-profit that I've never heard of... and I'm pretty familiar with Bay City, Michigan. I need to see a stronger case for inclusion than is already laid out. If it had some sort of historical context I'd feel differently. BaySail doesn't have an article and presumably doesn't meet WP:CORP (if you want to apply that to a non-profit) so I can't really support article creation for a redirect.--Isotope23 16:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not that notable - Aeon 05:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.