Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apocalypse Rising

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 00:11, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apocalypse Rising

non-notable band ➥the Epopt 00:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC --lightdarkness ^(talk) 00:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no assertion of notability, fails WP:MUSIC. Royboycrashfan 00:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable band. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Royboycrashfan. Batmanand | Talk 00:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC) On second thoughts, policy says keep per Monicasdude. Batmanand | Talk 07:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - Musicians have some weak claim to notability, giving the band some notability per WP:MUSIC. I just don't think that claim is strong enough. --Hyperbole 00:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. According to WP:MUSIC, a band is notable if it "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable." In this case, there are two members (Alex Marquez, Dennis Munoz) who have previously been members of notable bands (in Marquez' case, 3 notable bands). I expect the music this band will make will be unlistenable crap, but it's not appropriate to indulge my (or anyone else's) taste to exclude the band when it clearly meets the stated criteria for inclusion. Monicasdude 01:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude. dbtfz^talk 02:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per monicasdude, Hyperbole. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't Rolling Stone. Brian G. Crawford, the so-called "Nancy Grace of AfD" 04:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: per Monicasdude. BTW, what is meant by "This isn't Rolling Stone"? —Wknight94 (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: but the article needs fixing Swilk 04:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Sometimes WP:MUSIC engenders reactionary deletionist feelings in me but it is the consensus. JoshuaZ 05:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monica. Arbusto 06:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Well, I've got one of their CD's. Notable band members = notable band. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 07:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, notable band and per Monicasdude. --Terence Ong 09:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Certain band members may be deemed notable by various sources, but according to the article, they have yet to release even a demo. Gmrx 14:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable band. *drew 16:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude. We're not talking grammy here, but it passes borderline member notability. --Jay(Reply) 21:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude, who's arguements have not been countered. --Rob 22:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 00:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into the articles on Marquez and Munoz, or into Malevolent Creation. This band itself is not yet notable, but some of its members are. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.