Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apathyism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Rossami (talk) 04:22, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Apathyism

Neologism of no real relevance, only vaguely interesting because it is a homophone for Apatheism. Kelly Martin 20:05, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to apatheism. Meelar (talk) 20:46, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Make into redirect to Apatheism, which is what I'd originally done with it when I spotted it. First article by a new user; see User talk:DrBobStirling and User talk:Mindspillage. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:47, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'm not convinced that a redirect is appropriate. Kelly Martin 21:18, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

Why not? We have redirects for misspellings all the time. Meelar (talk) 01:28, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Apatheism. Delete Megan1967 07:34, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually in this instance a redirect is probably not the best solution. Megan1967 07:35, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Apatheism. Rewritten Article. I disagree strongly with the original Apatheism stub. I believe it overstates how broadly apathetic an Apatheist needs to be, and I was trying to express that interpretation without vandalizing the original stub. With further reading, I now believe that I went about it in an inappropriate way. I'm learning from it however. DrBobStirling 03:02, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• I just don't care. Merge with Apatheism. Dsmdgold 00:15, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.