Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aoi Umenokouji
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Aoi Umenokouji
Non-notable fictional character. Article is a plot summary of the character with no real-world context or significance, which fails WP:NOT#PLOT, and a trivia section which is discouraged under WP:TRIVIA. No substantial coverage in secondary sources to indicate notability per WP:FICT. "'Aoi Umenokouji' -wikipedia" on Google returns non-reliable fansites and forums, videogame guides, and unrelated mentions. Without reliable secondary sources independent of the subject to establish notability, it's impossible to rewrite or cleanup the article in such way that it doesn't fail WP:FICT and/or some clause of WP:NOT. Doctorfluffy 05:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 05:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Each Virtua Fighter character has a separate page, which might be problematic. I can't vote Delete or Merge on this page and leave the others alone. Could you consider withdrawing this AfD and opening up a discussion on the Virtua Fighter talk page? JuJube 11:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with this. Especially since, per WP:FICT, merge is the prefered option here, so this really ought to have started with a merge proposal. —Quasirandom 16:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom 16:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable character with no sources. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Merge per WP:FICT into List of Virtua Fighter characters, the parent article that it's a fork of. —Quasirandom 00:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: That's right, we must delete this trivial article that's only useful to a few thousand people in order to save electrons. Remember, save those electrons, they're more important than you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.148.100 (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep Why does this deserve deletion? it is as notable as the next VF Character The Straight Edge Superstar 00:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by PayneXKiller (talk • contribs)
- Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 21:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.