Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonique Smith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. --Coredesat 06:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Antonique Smith
Non-notable actress fails WP:BIO. Also, her IMDB page [1] seems especially non-notable. --BradBeattie 06:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Delete" Agree with nomination...An encyclopedia is not a place for people with a couple credits on obscure movies...that's what Imdb is for. Entirely non-notable.--MonkBirdDuke 09:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, not enough credits etc. Second Google hit is MySpace. Punkmorten 09:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete reads like Smith's blog, but in the third party. "Oh I hope I get the part!" becomes "She has expressed interest in the role of..." EVula 14:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, her most significant role is not on film but on Broadway -- Mimi in Rent is a very major role. Adding Internet Broadway Database source to article. NawlinWiki 15:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment A single major role doesn't secure notability. The article needs to be sourced significantly (and some of the stuff would just have to go) before I would consider it/her notable enough to stay. As it is, the whole article smacks of autobiography, between the editor's single-minded edit history [2] and unsourced minor claims ("She performed in various plays at her local church...", etc.). EVula 15:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Edited to cut out the unsourced stuff. NawlinWiki 15:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- "A single major role doesn't secure notability" is your POV and not based on WP:BIO policy or precedent. . --Marriedtofilm 17:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment A single major role doesn't secure notability. The article needs to be sourced significantly (and some of the stuff would just have to go) before I would consider it/her notable enough to stay. As it is, the whole article smacks of autobiography, between the editor's single-minded edit history [2] and unsourced minor claims ("She performed in various plays at her local church...", etc.). EVula 15:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep A star in major Broadway production and appeared in national television shows. --Marriedtofilm 17:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
