Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton's Law

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Anton's Law

Not verifiable. According to his edit on Selectively permeable membrane, Anton is the name of this editor. Jonnabuz (talk) 10:53, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Concur. Sjakkalle 10:57, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There is such a thing as Anton's Law though, it's a nickname for a US law regarding children's auto safety belts. Perhaps an article could be made about that, but we'd be better off without this bogus one in the history. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:48, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The equation described is the same method as that for finding the output of a voltage divider circuit, but the presentation as "Anton's Law" seems to be bogus. --Aurochs
• Delete. No such law in common electric circuit knowledge; no references cited. Samw 21:04, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.