Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoine Spiteri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antoine Spiteri

Delete. There is nothing particularly notable about this person in terms of WP:BIO. ^{[Check Google hits]} Google gives 92 results (40 "unique"), not many of which refer to the Spiteri in question. Publications proffered are a journal article in press and a paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association. Impressive by "regular people" standards, but not quite up to Wikipedia standards. Prod was removed by author. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity article. -Amatulic 01:11, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't see evidence that this person meets WP:BIO. --N Shar 01:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Lack of Google hits or claims to the contrary in the article lead me to believe that this guy does not pass the notability criteria for academics. -Elmer Clark 01:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. A no brainer. 129.98.197.86 01:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. EVula 02:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not sufficient evidence of prominence in field.Gobawoo 16:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Shadow1 (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above (suspect of self-bio posting) Arnoutf 21:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, vanity post. Xdenizen 01:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.