Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiwikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. We've got Criticism of Wikipedia already, don't we? - Mailer Diablo 22:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antiwikipedia

Apparently nn website, does not appear to meet WP:WEB criteria. -- Karada 23:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Though they seem to be trying to knock at this site. (sarcastic hypothetical coming up) If we delete this, do they win? Yanksox 23:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete: Currently their URL redirects to http://www.antiwikipedia.com/antiwiki/. Do we have an article on that website that this might be mentioned under? As of right now the subject is hardly worthy of article - its way too new, has no reliable sources, the list goes on and on. It's very likely that at some point it will become notable just by nature of its association with Wikipedia (or someone with a little more vision will come along and do something significant with the domain name) but until then, it doesn't really belong here. --Hetar 23:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, I wrote the article since I expected wikipedia to have some info on it's anti site. User Yanksox is right, if you choose to delete the article, pretty much they win since they support in some of their own articles the non-sensical deletion and artwork in wikipedia. Go ahead, delete it, that's what they want. We should choose to at least have some information on them than rather nothing.BrandNew21 23:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment If it had any other name, this site would be an automatic delete based on its obscurity. The rules should still apply, so Delete. Fan1967 01:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB. Also, the host site currently has no Alexa rank. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete good grief ... after looking at the site, I'm speechless ... BigDT 23:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Wow...that was sad. That is one stupid website. Thetruthbelow Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif(talk) 23:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't care about winning Internet battles and such; this is just a poor man's Uncyclopedia. Danny Lilithborne 00:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • What if they threw a feud and nobody came? Delete. The only claim to any sort of notability whatsoever seems to be, in essence, "It isn't Wikipedia". Lots of sites are not Wikipedia; if that counted for anything we could just toss WP:WEB entirely. —Zero Gravitas 00:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn. --Arnzy (whats up?) 00:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. nn website. We already have Criticism of Wikipedia for more notable occurences of this kind of thing. Confusing Manifestation 03:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, totally non-notable. Grandmasterka 03:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Does not meet WP:WEB. — TheKMantalk 06:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I like the site74.64.71.209 01:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the pretender. "not meant to actually be any source of knowledge or reference" is clear aspiration of WP. Pavel Vozenilek 02:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I started the site and you people who are calling for its deletions just prove that www.antiwikipedia.com is much too important to be on your site of techno-ignorance. I have no idea who made a Wikipedia page for it but it provided my amusement for the evening. The Antiwiki, while containing some criticism of the Wikipedia, is here to open all wisdom and technology to everyone on the planet. It is not meant to be a nonsense site like Uncyclopedia. It is meant to end history by creating a post-Hegelian dialetic. Do you know what this means? Maybe you should actually read Hegel instead of the Wikipedia article on Hegel. Why is it called Antiwikipedia? Because your mindless deleting of my articles started the idea of creating a site to aggregate all wisdom instead of creating a battleground to argue over some insane concept like 'NPOV'. There is no war because we have already won. Plus we'll get a post on Wikitruth perhaps? =) Much love, hugs, kisses, and check out the Not-To-Do List on the site.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.27.93 (talk • contribs)
    • Comment People who use "post-"anything in serious debates should shampoo my crotch. Danny Lilithborne 20:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Article was created by BrandNew21 (talk · contribs), whose third edit was made to 72.229.107.247 (talk · contribs). Seems like the two are synonymous. --Ted 18:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80004005'

[MySQL][ODBC 3.51 Driver][mysqld-4.0.27-max-log]MySQL client run out of memory

/antiwiki/incfile/log/log.asp, line 19
  • Nice. --Ted 04:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Here's a comment from a mirror of this article on their website:
Aparently someone did an article about us here, almost automatically some idiot proposed to delete it. I love it. It shows how authoritarian that fucking site is and how stupid all of them are by even debating if they should include us in their beloved articles. I'm for deletion of not only our article, but all articles.
So yeah, I guess the short answer is that they win. Cool. Delete without prejudice. The Disco King 19:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep the comments coming every one, this will make for a hilarious article on the AW.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.27.93 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete By striking this down it will become more powerful than you can ever imagine. I voted for this if only to see it deleted to prove their point.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.27.93 (talk • contribs)
Comment both of the above comments are from the "creator", as he claims in a previous votes, of Anti-wikipedia. Thetruthbelow (talk) 06:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB. Stifle (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • How has this not been deleted yet? What happened to the arbitrary immediate deletions we know and love on here? Sorry about the downtime, my host was upgrading the ODBC drivers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.27.93 (talk • contribs)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.