The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, made-up word bogdan (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Fails per WP:N. No such thing - there are no references by 3rd parties I could find anywhere. DJBullfish (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom and per WP:NEO. This appears to be entirely WP:MADEUP, happy to be proven wrong. Keeper | 76 19:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot to link my google search. It speaks for itself. Please look before rendering your welcome opinion. Keeper | 76 19:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.