Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AntiVirGear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 05:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AntiVirGear

AntiVirGear (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a directory of malware; no non-trivial secondary sources given; listing by Anti-Virus companies would be considered trivial. Prod contested; rationale was "software is notable enough to be on wiki". Jfire (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

oh shut up you lot. Wikipedia isnt this Wikipedia isnt that. Its informative, therefore should have its own article! Sotonfc4life —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sotonfc4life (talk • contribs) 10:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• delete per nom. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 18:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, seresin | wasn't he just...? 04:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Malware is not inherently notable by any means, nor is any other kind of software. This one utterly fails WP:RS, so it should go. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of coverage to make this notable.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sotonfc4life's suggestion that "this is informative!" (and to extent makes the argument that "Wikipedia is for everything") isn't a good reason to keep. This has no reliable sources and seems to be a directory] Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 16:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.