Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-feminism and Chris Choat2003 endnotes

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. (both) - Mailer Diablo 09:54, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-feminism and Chris Choat2003 endnotes

I am not sure what this is, but it isn't encyclopedic articles. The two articles are created by the same author and sharing some traits, so I joined the vfd requests. Thue | talk 22:50, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Quoi? Hmm, seems to be a POV rant. breaking the contract indeed. Delete. Sabine's Sunbird 23:01, 26 Mar

2005 (UTC)

• Delete Non-encyclopedic. Original research. TigerShark 23:27, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• This is clearly labeled POV and extensively supported. Admin didn't read to find out what it is. Sunbird's impression that this is a rant proves to be wrong on inspection, as this is a properly and constructively made arguement. Thue separated the body from its research / support, which was scrambled bythe wiki text editor. It's not easy to see what that part is in it's current presentation as it needs to be extensively reformatted and completed. I believe the works conforms to regs and policy, but could have missed something. Please cite / reference any specific policies violated.

  Unsigned comment by Zdcma16 (talk · contributions)

  • Delete. Violates Wikipedia is not a soapbox, specifically items 4 and 5. android↔talk 00:14, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
  • Please cite / reference any specific policies violated Aside from the self-admitted POV? I sympathise with the endnote issues, mind, it is a wretched programme. Sabine's Sunbird 01:33, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Appears to be original research, posing as some sort of movement. Dysprosia 00:47, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete original research. DaveTheRed 00:58, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• This is clearly labeled POV. Really? Then check out Wikipedia:Neutral point of view ("Wikipedia policy is that all articles should be written from a neutral point of view." Delete.--Calton | Talk 01:36, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Anti-feminism appears to be the same text as Anti-Feminism (note different capitalization) which I marked (yesterday) as a copyvio. Google turned up the text in a couple of other places on the web: [1] and [2]. FreplySpang 02:42, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research. mat334 | talk 02:48, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV, original research, nonsense, gobbledygook. Any and all of them. RickK 06:06, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original POV nonsense. Jayjg ^(talk) 10:15, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.