Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Pakistani sentiment (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. PhilKnight (talk) 06:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Pakistani sentiment

Anti-Pakistani sentiment (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination, stemming from Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 March 12 (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistanphobia). No opinion. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per numerous previous arguments. For every nation foo, we have Anti-foo sentiment; the topic is encyclopedic, inherently verifiable, and almost always notable unless it's a country that no one knows about. There are several sources to be had to show the topic is notable for this country. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 16:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Article fails to adhere to WP:N, and reads much more like a political opinion piece than an encyclopedic article. An article that adheres to Wikipedia's policies could likely be written, but this one would need torn down and rewritten from the ground up to survive. I would also point out that "Other articles already exist" and "It's real" are not substantial arguments. -- Kesh (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep since the topic is notable, but stubbify and start over. This is an extreme example of POV editing.—Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 04:48, March 20, 2008
• Delete Article fails WP:NPharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, since it's a notable topic, but start again with a NPOV. Klausness (talk) 11:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep per potential of article. –thedemonhog talk • edits 19:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.