Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Malay racism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 21:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Malay racism

Anti-Malay racism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

NPOV lack of good resource Zack2007 13:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete The article's name itself goes against the NPOV policy. That, and the contents of the article, suggests a definite POV of the article. And on a lighter note, the article does not cite its sources. --Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and rename. It doesn't strike me as terribly POV or uncited, and it also strikes me as a perfectly valid topic to cover. One could hardly object to an article like Anti-Black racism (even if one wished it had a more mellifluous name), since racism directed against people of darker hue is a well known phenomenon. I have little trouble believing that Malays might have suffered from prejudices as well, since everyone does sooner or later. --136.223.3.130 14:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is heavily sourced; there are 20 cited materials. How is that not sourced? If it is NPOV, one should work to improve it, not delete it. Consider also Anti-Japanese sentiment, Anti-Mexican sentiment, Anti-Mormonism, Anti-Pakistani sentiment, Anti-Protestantism, Anti-Quebec sentiment, Anti-Romanian discrimination, Anti-Russian sentiment, among others that fall in similar vein to the article in discussion. __earth ^(Talk) 16:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: It seems that many citations are from the same sources. Hence lack of reliable sources.--Zack2007 02:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per Zacharycrimsonwolf.   jj137 (Talk) 01:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep (I change my stand) It contains information that can be improved further. --Zack2007 10:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.