Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropos Consulting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete both. —Cleared as filed. 21:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anthropos Consulting and Corporate Anthropology

Non-notable company. I am also nominating Corporate Anthropology in with this article as they reference each other and the "corporate anthropology" article seems to be an advert for Anthropos. Andy Saunders - 00:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete and Delete Attempt to advertise --Bugturd 01:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

It is not true that Anthropos Consulting is a non-notable company. If you visit the site www.anthropos.com.br and look at client list you´ll find most of the 500 Fortune companies with branches in Brazil and Latin America. As the first established company in corporate anthropology it´s natural the link. It will be a loss for Wikipedia to not have corporate anthropology and Anthropos Consulting in file. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinsfilho (talk • contribs)

• The unsigned entry above was placed by the author (and possibly the subject) of the article. The only contributions by this user are the article creations and the comment above. --Bugturd 01:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as badvertising, made worse by trying to use WP to provide a legitimacy to their methodology that is otherwise lacking. Eusebeus 07:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• IMHO being able ti list notable others as your customers does not make you notable. Consider a sandwich vendor who delivers around the London Stock Exchange. Delete as advertising copy. -- Simon Cursitor 09:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising, and delete unless rewritten. Google seems to indicate that "coporate anthropology" is indeed a real term, but the current article is nothing more than badvertising. Zunaid 12:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertisment. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 14:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.